
To get to the point, one evening we were playing this game called “State Your Unpopular Opinion”. Now I’ll admit that I’ve got a few of ‘em – for example, I firmly hold that laws against midget-tossing should be repealed. However, I’ve never faced such inclement disgust as when I voiced my opinion on the 1995 Mel Gibson movie Braveheart.
“It’s not great,” I told my co-workers. “It’s really just a corny, stupid action flick.”
The crowd was not impressed.
“You’re a fool!” one of the bartenders gasped.
“I’ve just lost all respect I ever had for you as a human being,” another said.
So thus my review of this film – to justify my well-founded opinion on it, and to expose to others that Braveheart is a ridiculous, inaccurate, Anglo-phobic hoax made by an anti-Semitic fuckwad (but that it’s still a pretty entertaining action flick).
Oh where to begin. Well, I suppose the beginning of the movie is a good place to start, where a young William Wallace (Gibson), his father and brother fight against the hated English, who occupy Scottish lands. Gibson emerges from the battle unscathed, but his father and bro are killed, meaning that Wallace has to go off to some distant land to be raised by his uncle.
Flash forward a decade (give or take), and Wallace has returned to his beloved Scotland, only to see that the land is still ruled with an iron fist by the cruel English King, Edward I, or “Longshanks” (still one of the most badass nicknames a king can have).
Wallace falls in love with the village babe, Murron. As screenplay logic dictates, practically minutes after they’re married, evil English troops swoon in, with the local Lord demanding “primae noctis” – basically, the right of the local Lord to bone one’s wife before anyone else does. Now here’s the rub: there’s no evidence at all – zilch, zero, nada – that “primae noctis” was used by Longshanks, nor by any English army at the time. So in essence, Hollywood invented this completely. As well, the actor who plays the local Lord is about as appealing as one of the locals at the Hamilton Yacht Club, meaning he’s got the looks of a monkey with none of the intelligence. What would happen if said Lord were played by, say, George Clooney? Or better yet, Hugh Grant? Sigh…
Moving on, Murron gets killed for trying to defend her honour, Wallace loses his shit, starts a battle, and before you know it, a full-out war to gain Scottish independence is underway. No, wait…that doesn’t sound right. It’s a fight for Scottish freedom. No…hold on….not quite there…it’s a fight for FREEDOM!!!!
This type of bullshit line is used again and again throughout Braveheart. Wallace utters the word “freedom!” only 120 times or so, and even at the end of the film, when the English are mercifully gutting the simplistic goon, he manages to scream out “freedom!!” (In real life, Wallace’s last words were probably more like, “FUCK THIS HURTS!!!”)
See, the problem with Braveheart is that at its core, it’s just not true. Sure, William Wallace was a heroic figure who fought for Scottish FREEDOM!!!, but that’s about it. For example:
-In the film, Wallace and his men wear belted plaid. However, in the period in question, no Scot wore this, let alone kilts of any kind
-Wallace himself never met Isabelle, the French princess
-Wallace was actually a rich landowner, not a simple village lad
-Primae noctis was never used by King Edward, nor any of his armies
This probably only scrapes the tip of the iceberg.
Braveheart does get a few things right. Longshanks, for example, is a fantastic villain; in fact, I was rooting for him the whole movie. The supporting cast is appropriately stereotypical. And the French Princess, Isabelle, is a total babe.
As well, it is an entertaining film. If it was on TV right now, chances are I’d be watching it. It’s well-filmed. The acting is decent enough. The sets and the costumes and the fighting and everything else are truly top-notch.
But my main argument is that people think that Braveheart is on par with something like Schindler’s List or Citizen Cane. It’s not, and it’s a crime that it fucking won Best Picture and Best Director. I realize that year was a particularly weak one (seriously, Babe was one of the other contenders), but still…Se7en and Usual Suspects are both ’95 flicks…and those two are miles above and beyond this stinking hunk of Scottish bullshit.
Take Braveheart for what it is: an action movie – nothing more, nothing less. That, my dear readers, is my unpopular opinion.





